The working principle of a molecular washing
            machine is extremely simple: what we want to wash is
            decomposed into single molecules, the molecules of dirt are
            separated and removed, the clean molecules are recomposed
            into an object that was to be washed. We do prefer the word
            decompose to the
              word break
              for it suggests an action far more gentle than breaking,
              besides, what can be decomposed can be recomposed while
              what has been broken is broken – well, it can be put
              together again, but it won’t be the same, and the action
              of breaking is just brutal and disgusting. This is why we don’t speak and
              write about tearing apart, smashing and mashing, grinding,
              crashing. Such terms are repelling and
              discouraging. It’s
              acceptable to say and write reduce to prime
              factors, however not
              indicating what these prime factors are in case of a
              jumper, shoe, bag, bicycle or vehicle. If these mysterious
              factors make clients deeply suspicious or bring too
              many associations with annihilation, we can replace the
              prime factors with the secondary or tertiary ones.
           
          The given examples of things
              washed are not sheer fantasy. MWM can wash everything. Even this text. As well as
              all other texts. The whole Liberland can be washed with no
              problem. The text would be decomposed into single letters,
              letters into strokes, loops, bowls, stems, ears, bars,
              ogoneks... and these
              prime factors into
              dots and lines. Dots
              and lines will not be decomposed because they can be
              decomposed only into dots and lines which makes no sense.
           
          MWM has neither a specific
              shape nor size. It has no shape and no size at all. We
              assume it can take a shape of a thing that is being
              washed. MWM is, first of all, a process which sometimes,
              quite rarely, manifests as something similar to a Remoska,
              although not round – the term amoeboidal Remoska will not be
              unjustified.
           
          At the end we should tackle the
              problem of efficiency and reliability. MWM is not an
              efficient device for it is not a device. Unless we assume
              a process is a device, or a device can be a process. MWM
              is extremely efficient process and, to some extent,
              absolutely reliable. It means: decomposing is reliable and
              absolute. There are no things that can’t be decomposed.
              However recomposing is not absolutely reliable. It can
              happen MWM can give us back something else than we put into it. This doesn’t happen often,
              but it does. And this is what should be improved. But be
              careful. A bit of
              uncertainty and madness can be useful. A lottery can
              always find its lovers. As well as gambling and risky affairs. It can happen that a wrongly recomposed thing can turn out to be the one we have always been
              dreaming of. And such possibility can not be eliminated.